White Eyes Syndrome Trial is on

(Year 231) The trial involving ex-Politician Victor F. Tangerin (73) opened last week. He was sued by a group of teens and children, lead by Amy Cracrow (17) from Henford-on-Bagley. Tangerin is charged for spreading his White Eyes syndrome by having children around the nation, while still being married and without paying any child support ever.

The Court House foyer was busy with involved persons and press. Just a few minutes before they had to enter the court room, Amy Cracrow posed with 5 other of Tangerin's secret children. Several of them  wore sunglasses to hide their defect eyes.

In addition to Amy, who guested the Simmerville Show recently (video), we recognized David Fyres (11), son of Council House Secretary Siobhan "Joanna" Fyres (47), now married to Dr. Hump. 3 of the offended teens were not present.

Sim City TV was there to report from the trial, that is expected to last several days. Then there will be a break until we get the verdict closer to Summer.

When Amy Cracrow was interviewed, she stated that their case has many sides, and the lack of child support is not the most important.

- We are half siblings without knowing it because our common father never admitted his actions. Our mothers were his real victims, and he always wore sunglasses when forcing himself onto them. He never helped raising us, not as a parent or a financial asset, despite being quite wealthy.

- And, he betrayed his wife, Claudia Tangerin?

- Well, he did, but she would need to run her own trial, our Lawyer advised us not to involve her because the case would easily become way more complex.

Then the charged Victor F. Tangerin appeared in the foyer, assisted by his wife, Claudia Tangerin (76). She kept saying - No comment, left and right, while Victor Tangerin himself seemed rather muted. He naturally looks much older than in his days as the Mayor of Region 12.

As soon as the press got their pictures, the elderly couple walked into the Court room.

The Lawyers have kept quiet this far. It's to be assumed that they want to sum up the first day before they share anything with the press.

Ever since the case was announced on the Simmerville Show we have wondered what crimes were committed and what punishment will be fair. Having a child outside marriage was never taken to court, having 8 makes little difference. It would still be solved outside court. Spreading a DNA defect might be more critical, but only if the defect has already been declared a danger. Not providing child support would be a crime only if the mothers did request such support.

We can see that the case is dramatic, but we have no idea what the outcome might be like. Perhaps there are more to it, maybe all details are not yet known? In a few weeks we will know.